This is just an observation, for anybody concerned: there is some obvious sexism going on in the United States against women, and the defeat of Hillary Clinton in the presidential election is an indication of this. And I don’t even necessarily mean a sexism on the part of the people who voted against her — it’s also evident at the media level, the insuperable hype machine churning out those “e-mail conspiracy” stories, again and again. That was the result of, what, one death of an ambassador? How hard could that be to set up? Even if the initial cause of this hoax against Hillary wasn’t exactly “sexist” in DNA, but rather exacted against her for her being the primary competitor to conglomerate legions which would have wanted Trump in office, the fact of its being able to materialize with such velocity indicates a lack of societal bulwarks PROTECTING women from such scandals. We had a female cop in Oklahoma slay an African American in a criminal altercation, and instantly get prosecuted, whereas the assailants of Alton Sterling had their case “investigated,” male, and have still not had charges brought. The Hillary Clinton vie for presidency would have been the perfect platform for feminists to step out and support the politician’s efforts; yet, we barely saw any zest or zeal for having a woman leader. The reason? Women already rule, in the United States, within the deep, stirring realms of dating and romance, and this provides them with more than enough satisfaction already.
All the time, we hear about feminism. We hear the diatribes of angry females around the nation, claiming that “It’s a man’s world,” claiming how men make more money, and have all the control. Yet, I do not remember one single feminist organization coming out to support Hillary Clinton in the past few years. Part of this, I believe, is a fear on the part of feminists before the idea of a loss of their own hegemonic victimization. As we know, the goal of any activist is to work his or her way out of a job, and joblessness is obviously a scary thing.
But even amidst the moderately liberal women voters in America, those not necessarily given to mounting sanctions against men, but who do believe in big government and safe, legal abortion as leftists should, there was not an overwhelming quarry of the ENERGY to unite. Could it have been fear of being persecuted for said actions by the male governing machine? Probably. And to an extent that’s understandable, or at very least off limits for me as a man to discuss. There is also just the social chasm encompassed by the very act of being different, of creating a CULTURE of maternalistic rule in a nation (which by the way is already in effect in Ghana) — the tentativeness to step out and say something apart from the crushing norm, whatever it may be. One thing seems clear: women already hold an intrinsic power in realms such as dating, so there’s possibly some MERCY being enacted on their part by their allotting men at least the bulk of the power in politics, not to mention some desire on the part of sexist judges to retaliate against the natural primal advantage mentioned earlier.